Quantum Mechanics and Epr Paradox

نویسنده

  • Miloš V Lokajíček
چکیده

The orthodox quantum mechanics has been commonly regarded as being supported decisively by the polarization EPR experiments, in which Bell's inequalities have been violated. The given conclusion has been based, however, on several mistakes that have not been yet commonly known and sufficiently analyzed. The whole problem will be newly discussed and a corresponding solution will be proposed. 1. Introduction It is commonly believed that the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanical model represents the only possibility of describing physical processes of microworld. The main support for such statement is seen in the results of experiments proposed in principle by Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen in 1935 [1]. The way to their interpretation in agreement with Copenhagen school has been, however, paved at least by three mistakes. The first one coming from von Neumann [2] in 1932 has been step-by-step discovered already earlier (G. the other two mistakes have not been known and discussed to a sufficient extent until now. One of them relates to Bell's inequalities as their derivation has been based on one assumption, the impact of which has not been generally recognized; the assumption being hardly acceptable for the common type of polarization EPR experiments. It has not been possible to derive these inequalities without such an assumption. The corresponding analysis of the problem may be found in Ref. [6]. As to the third mistake (see the book of Belifante [7]) it has had probably yet more important impact on the conviction of the most physicists. F. Belifante argued in 1973 that practically any hidden-variable theory was to provide significantly different predictions from those derived with the help of standard quantum-mechanical model, which is not true. It will be shown in the following that already a very simple hidden-variable theory gives practically the same predictions for a pair of polarizers (including EPR coincidence experiments) as the standard quantum mechanics. Some important differences between hidden-variable interpretation and quantum mechanics should exist, of course, e.g., in the light transmission through three polariz-ers. Such experiments inspired by preliminary theoretical results were performed and published in 1993 and 1994 (see [8, 9]); they have shown that the standard quantum-mechanical theory of polarized light should be regarded in principle as falsified by these experimental results. A way of interpreting these experimental results on a new basis should be looked for. The problem concerning the derivation of Bell's inequalities will be summarized shortly in Sec. …

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

On the solution of the EPR paradox and the explanation of the violation of Bell’s inequality

A new theory is proposed offering a consistent conceptual basis for nonrelativistic quantum mechanics. The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox is solved and the violation of Bell’s inequality is explained by maintaining realism, inductive inference and Einstein separability.

متن کامل

On the EPR Phenomenon

The origin of the nonlocal nature of quantum mechanics is investigated in the context of Everett's formulation of quantum mechanics. EPR phenomenon can fully be explained without introducing any kind of decoherence.

متن کامل

ar X iv : q ua nt - p h / 06 09 12 6 v 1 1 7 Se p 20 06 SU ( 2 ) Relativity and the EPR Paradox

In the normal presentation of the EPR problem a comparison is made between the (weak) Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics which seems to suggest that at times action at a distance may take place, and the hidden parameter interpretation which must satisfy Bell’s inequality, in contradiction to the predictions of quantum mechanics. In this paper, we consider a relativistic approach to ...

متن کامل

Open Questions in Quantum Physics

N. CUFARO PETRONI Istituto.Naziona1e di Fisica Nuc1eare Dipartimento di Fisica de1l'Universita 70100, Bari,Italy The physical basis. for a fluidodynamical model of quantum mechanics and the subsequent possibility of a causal, non-local explanation of the EPR paradox are shortly discussed.

متن کامل

05 07 4 v 1 2 5 M ay 1 99 8 Is the EPR paradox a paradox ?

The EPR paradox and the meaning of the Bell inequality are discussed. It is shown that considering the quantum objects as carrying with them " instruction kits " telling them what to do when meeting a measurement apparatus any paradox disappears. In this view the quantum state is characterized by the prescribed behaviour rather than by the specific value a parameter assumes as a result of an in...

متن کامل

The EPR Argument in a Relational Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

It is shown that in the Rovelli relational interpretation of quantum mechanics, in which the notion of absolute or observer independent state is rejected, the conclusion of the ordinary EPR argument turns out to be frame-dependent, provided the conditions of the original argument are suitably adapted to the new interpretation. The consequences of this result for the ‘peaceful coexistence’ of qu...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2002